6.5.3 LLM Debates

LLM Debates for more informed decisions

Your idea of LLM-structured debate with built-in constraints is actually pretty strong for surfacing high-quality arguments efficiently. It would probably produce better discussions than most real open-source projects have today.

But it's still fundamentally: LLMs generate arguments → humans judge which arguments win and whether the constraints were right.

You haven't actually removed the human decision-making; you've just made it more informed and structured. That might be exactly what you want—better information for human decision-makers. But it's not "LLMs deciding," it's "LLMs arguing while humans referee and set the rules."

Is that what you meant, or were you hoping for something where humans step back further?